Thursday, March 16, 2006

Keep the guests moving!


The Imagineers of the 60’s attempted to keep park guests on the move with huge and innovative new ride systems. As we think about Re-Imagineering Disneyland it would be good to take a look back at this phenomenon, not just for nostalgia's sake, but with the idea of improving today’s guest experience.

Part of the old magic of Disneyland was that, as a park guest, you felt you were constantly being masterfully moved throughout the park. Old Tomorrowland was probably the best example of how designers were able to keep park guests on the move. With the Carousel of Progress, Peoplemover, Adventure through Inner Space, Subs, Skyway, Monorail and Circlevision Theater all running at the same time – it had more capacity than any other land in the park! Today Pirates, Haunted Mansion and Small World still showcase some of the best capacity conscious ride systems ever designed, and they continue to successfully cycle thousands of guests per hour, day after day, year after year.

Recently, new additions have been smaller capacity attractions, like Pooh and Buzz Lightyear. At the same time Disneyland continues to get more crowded and attraction queue lines get longer. Personally, as a guest, I would much rather wait in a large queue line if I can see that it is moving fast.

As new attractions are developed today, it would be great to see much more emphasis on developing clever new ways to move people through them on a grand scale. New innovations such as motion bases, speed accelerators and the like are terrific additions, but I think capacity should be the primary concern for overall park guest satisfaction.

Even a return to some of those classic tried and true high capacity ride systems would be appreciated by park guests today.

41 comments:

Dan said...

I agree (mostly) -- bring back the Tomorrowland transportation... but I'd seriously rather wait an extra 15 minutes in line for Pirates instead of being rushed through bumper-to-bumper for the sake of keeping the queue short. Obviously the ride operators never ride Pirates themselves when it's that busy, but they need to concentrate more on providing a good ride experience and less on providing a short wait. My back can't take much more of my boat's constant smacking into all of the other boats fore and aft!

micsaund said...

Absolutely - without capacity, the rides are much less enjoyable. However, the ride should still feel like you're the center of the show and give a good experience and duration (that's big on my mind since I just read about the failed Rocket Rods tonight for the first time).

I personally find the interesting methods of conveyance just as interesting as the sights and sounds. That's one thing I've always loved about Disney -- the Peoplemover, the Omnimover, the monorail, etc. All of these were new and different forms of moving you around that you could (can) not see in everyday life. That's one reason why I hate the busses in WDW so much -- why couldn't they pry the corporate wallet open to build more monorail tracks and keep the image/thrill/interest high?

Mike

Klark Kent 007 said...

The omnimovers were a brilliant concept (in use in the Haunted Mansion, Spaceship Earth, Peoplemover, and formerly in Horizons). These days the designers are more concerned with the "thrill" ride, of which the down side few can be thrilled at a time.

This is the same thinking that has turned Disney in the "tween extereme" debacle it is now.

Keep us moving, and we will be happy. Don't make us stand in line for 65 minutes to ride Peter Pan's Flight (which is only a 10 minute ride.

mnmears said...

I couldn't agree more that capacity should be taken into consideration when planning new attractions.

I know I've already read some fears/concerns about the Nemo redo in the submarine lagoon. The capacity isn't there -- most everyone knows it -- and people are going to forced to wait an hour or more even on modest attendance days.

I also wonder how Disneyland is handling the off-season crowds with Pirates being taken out of the mix. The adult-pay-the-kids-price promotion has also helped keep those attendance figures high. I've heard that recent weekends have been more crowded than July 17 for the official 50th birthday.

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm really looking forward to the Finding Nemo attraction -- but I'm not looking forward to 60 to 90 minute waits surrounded by today's children whose patience will seriously be tried.

I've stood in line for an hour and more -- of, course, very few Disney employees or Imagineers have to do this.

Some times if you're in the right cluster of people or the queue is interesting (Indy, Cartoon Spin, Haunted Mansion) it's OK.

But, as a guest, I'll say it's even worse to wait 30 minutes or more at the restaurants, outdoor vending carts and stores. Hire the people needed to do the job ... and if they're good, they're worth paying a living wage.

I don't begrudge the executives their salaries ... but the magic -- the real pixie dust -- is created by those who interact with the guests.

People-eating, crowd-pleasers ... that's what is needed ... keep us moving and in control over doing so at our own pace.

Anonymous said...

World on the move was I believe the concept of an older Tommorrowland. I have many a time thought about movement as in around the park at Disneyland.
One the plus note I am one who uses the Main St vehicles not only for their ambiance but as a mode of transportation. If I need to go to a locker or somewhere up by the entrance to meet friends I use Main St transportation. No it dosent take away from my trips into the shops to spend spend spend, that is a Disney experience within itself, I view the shopping as a resort experience, I am also a great user of the train also for the ambiance of being able to travel from land to land comfortably with great entertainment and scenery along the way.The monarail has the same appeal to get to the hotel and more shopping and restraunts.
We need more themed transportation methods to get the foot traffic off of the ground and more of the omnivour system vehicles to move the crowds along but only when applicable to the ride experience and the park.
The last time I visited the park I really missed the trams as I do everytime I visit the park and the Mickey and Friends structure I always wonder why a company as innovative and progressive at Disney cannot start the guest experience with some sort of themed transportation method from each parking aisle to the elevators of beyond! to the existing trams! Even if its only character or park themed moving ramps . The elevators are a joke with the suv strollers and assisted vehicles trying to get in the elevators not to mention they are ugly elevators very ugly!A good transportation system with themeing that builds the anticipation of going to the park would have people begging to park on the top floor.
The Monarail stopping at DCA with of course an entry/exit turnstiles would make more people enter DCA. Heck people would probably flock there and consider it another land not even realizing they alread paid for it, how about those who dont have it included in their day , they hop the monarail and see a station to get off at , look out get a peak , open their wallets pull out their credit card and pay for admission.

mnmears said...

In the vein of keeping the guests moving, I've always wondered why Disneyland didn't put a PeopleMover system from the enormous garage to the Main Gate plaza ... seems like it would have been an efficient way to use the PeopleMover as Walt had intended and would have required a lot fewer employees and been more energy efficient to boot. Where were the number crunchers on this one?

Anonymous said...

I love it mnmears the parking lot to DL entrance is an evil trip as we know it today! Yuk Yuk , untheamed , not efficient and smelly!
Disney come on show your muscle and inovativeness make the trip a prelude of things to come both in the park and for the future. Mass transit has evolved from the Monarail ( think SF bay area BART) show us the future of transportion, think green ( maybe a certain Frog as the narrator).
I know we will never see the Skyway as it was but there must be some inovative way to get guest from Tommorrowland to Fantasyland thats on the cutting edge, think mail air tubes that were used to transport documents from dept to inter dept, throw us into a tube, shrink us like Monsanto , air transport us and bingo we are in another land! As a guest I am really into the resorts transportation systems be it a horse and cart, a train , a monarail or a futuristic mode to me its all part of the experience. Any updates on making those flying saucers , really lift into the air and take off and land in another land? I trust that the creative minds that be will give the guest great new themed ways around the park, a new look at the future, expand on but not loose site that history is history and can not be rewritten for PC sake in the frontier, keep our fanstasys alive and be true to what hard facts America is made of. Preserve Walts fifth Freedom and GO FOR IT!

traci said...

My parents took me to disneyland every year, the last time I went there I was twenty, now 38 I can't even imagine how the place has changed, but the Disneyland I grew up with is how is should be, full of imagination, travel and adventures to places only Disney could find, and the prices too, think a family of 5 could get into the park for under $50.00? No way, maybe in the late 70's.

Imagineer-in-Waiting said...

Anyone for Segways? They have them at Epcot. It themes well for Futureworld. For mobility impaired guests they're a godsend and gee-whiz tech to boot.

Monorails? Go to monorails.org and see why monorails keep failing to get support. Best estimate for Disney was $68 million per track mile. That's initial capital investment, not maintenance and repair.

If you don't like the buses at WDW, take the boats. I've always found them magical. Of course, in most cases, you have to be staying at one of the upscale hotels to fully utilize them... In many cases, I took the big ferries instead of the monorails at the end of the day because their throughput was greater AND you had a chance to see the electrical water pagent.

The Skyway always had ride capacity and throughput problems. I like riding through the Matterhorn as much as anyone, but an hour wait for the Skyway?

We have more internal inconsistencies again. Haunted Mansion has greater throughput because they keep the doors to the stretching room open longer (sometimes even when it's in the middle of the spiel!). Someone else on this blog bemoaned the illusion shattering effect. It's a tradeoff.

The worst loss was the Disneyland's Peoplemover. Continuous mode loading, steady line advancement. Couldn't be beat. Peoplemover from the garage sounds good. I think it would be more appreciated at the end of the day when feet are sore.

Ugly elevators? Safety compliance and Americans with Disabilities Act compliance trumps imagineering. Want a great example of ADA overkill. I was at a government office building. There's an inclined walking path with prominent signage clearly stating "Path is NOT ADA compliant" and directs people to the nearby elevator. Imagine the illusion shattering effect of that on a ride.

Todd said...

Yes! Since moving to Orlando, I've been able to visit a couple of the Disney parks (MGM Studios and the Magic Kingdom, Epcot's next), and what struck me the most was how small they felt. Some of this is no doubt because I'm much older than the last time I visited, but the sheer number of people coursing through the parks' streets definitely detracts from the magic. At times it feels much like a mall during Christmas season (all the stores doesn't help much, either). It seems the only innovation in moving people is happening in the parking lots, where they added a ferry to alleviate the stress put on the poor monorails.

Merlin Jones said...

One thing I loved about Walt Disney's vision of a World on the Move was that it embraced every posssible level of transoprtation: BELOW the surface (Submarine Voyage), ON the surface (Autopia, Motor Boat Cruise, Bobsleds), OVER the surface (Monorail, PeopleMover) and ABOVE the surface/in the sky (Skyway, Rocket Jets).

What an incredible parfait of differring travel experiences on what is essentially the same turf!

Now we have been completely reduced to on-and over-the-surface trips - - a way-dumbing-down of the whole concept (at least until the subs reopen).

We need to return to the skies and depths, both literally and metaphorically.

yensid98 said...

I'm glad to see people talking about a people mover between the Disneyland parking structure and the park itself. I've been thinking the same thing since I first visited the park in 1999. We can only hope that Imagineers are seeing this.

As for Tomorrowland, I long for the day where a world on the move returns. The more modes of transportation in Tomorrowland the better.

PARISINJUNE said...

NOT ONLY HAS THE CONCEPT OF MOVEMENT DIED IN TOMORROWLAND, BUT THE CONCEPT OF THE LAND ITSELF. LEFT UNATTENDED OVER SUCH A LONG PERIOD OF TIME IT NO LONGER CHALLENGES THE MIND TO THE CONCEPT ITSELF. AUTOTOPIA STILL EXISTS ON A RAIL. THE IDEA WAS NEVER ADVANCED OR EVOLVED, MAYBE TO INCLUDE THE POSSIBILTY OF REMOVING THE RAIL AND PUTTING THE ATTRACTION ON A TYPE OF AIR COMPRESSION TYPE SYSTEM--LIKE A HOVERCRAFT. IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IF MISSION MARS DUDS OUT IN AROUND FIVE YEARS. WE HAVE GOT TO STOP TRYING TO JUST ENTERTAIN PEOPLE AND GET THEM DREAMING AGAIN. MOVEMENT AND FLOW AT THIS POINT TAKES A BACK SEAT, CONCEPT SHOULD BE THE FOCUS. WHERE'S THE CHALLENGE?

Will Robison said...

We have a peoplemover system here in San Francisco at the airport. I've always been tempted to just go to the airport so that I can ride it around and around and around... but the boys at Homeland Security might have a say in that matter ;)

The point is that the Classic DL experience to me had the skyway, the peoplemover, the train, the Main Street vehicles, etc... I didn't appreciate all of them at the time, but I'd sure appreciate them now. When Disney decided that only the opinions of teenagers mattered as to what stayed and what went at the themeparks they absolutely missed the entire point of Disneyland. Its a park for all ages - not just the ones with little kids and teenagers. There should be things there that appeal to everyone at some point in their life. That's how you get people to come back again and again and again - because the magic changes with them.

They need to bring back the transportation, but they also need to bring back a lot of the A, B, C, and D ticket items that filled out our day at Disneyland.

RogerRmjet said...

I'd love to see the People Mover return to Disneyland. I hate that the empty track just hangs over Tomorrowland. We love the People Mover (TTA) at WDW -- it's a great way to kick back and relax for a bit while waiting on other rides. That's the beauty of the Skyway, the keel boats, and other smaller rides. They give people something else to do, rather than just stand around and wait.

The transportation system at WDW really disappoints me. When I went to WDW as a kid, Disney made all these promises of the future of transporation with the People Mover, Monorail, etc. Well, now the future is hear, and Disney didn't keep it's promises. Why no monorails to the other parks or the resorts? How about People Movers going between the resorts or from the TTC to MK? The buses are a pain and grossly inefficient. Don't worry, I know the answers to my questions. I hope now with new management we may get some improvement one day.

Anonymous said...

Imaineer in waiting:

I believe your $68,000,000 per track mile is way off.
The price - several years ago - was just over $1,000,000 per mile, exclusive of trains.

And if monorail trains cost $67,000,000 each, that's a business I want to get into!

MightySpork said...

I stumbled onto your blog and I have really enjoyed it. I have been a fan of Disneyland since I was little. it was always magic for me. Now that I am grown it feels like it has lost a lot of that magic for me. I feared it was because I was older, but reading your blog and remembering the way it used to me, in the distant corners of my memory tell me that it's not me, it's them. I also love to see the way it used to be, before I was born. Thanks, I will continue to read!

Casey said...

You ever read a book by E.L. Doctorow called _The Book of Daniel_? There's a great digression near the end about the people-managing systems at Disney.. it's a bit of a political rant, I suppose, but even as self-contained analysis it's pretty cool. Good blog. Carry on.

dan_steinberg said...

Capacity is Disneyland's Number 1 biggest problem - and not just from an aesthetic or guest experience standpoint. It’s a huge business problem for them. Here's why:

Disney is, after all, a publicly traded corporation and therefore Disneyland - like all other major parts of the company - must continue to increase profits year after year. And there are only 4 ways to do that: either get more customers, get more money per customer, cut expenses, or some combination of the above.

The problem is that Disneyland has been pretty much filled to its practical capacity much of the time, so without more capacity it can't get more customers easily. This leaves only getting more money per guest and cutting costs, both of which the previous couple of management regimes pursued with much zeal. Now I don't think there's a lot more Disney can do on those two: How much more can they raise ticket, food and souvenir prices - $100 a day and $5 for a Coke? And how much lower can they go with Cast Member salaries - like turnover and low-quality hires isn't a problem already? So for Disneyland to grow financially, they *absolutely* need to add capacity.

Of course, Disney’s California Adventure was supposed help out by adding more capacity. The lesson there is that extra capacity doesn’t help if nobody wants to use it. Personally, I’ve always thought that DCA should come free with Disneyland – every DL ticket should be a no-extra-charge Park Hopper. That way, guests will feel free to go across the Esplanade to DCA’s E-tickets when Disneyland fills up, freeing up room for more total visitors. (I’m guessing this didn’t happen because some exec had a wet dream about getting people to buy two full-priced tickets in a single day - one for DL and one for DCA. Yeah, right.)

Anyway, my point is that Disneyland can’t cost-cut their way to long-term financial growth – only by adding more capacity is that level of growth possible.

Rebecca said...

I agree that they need to keep people moving. I'm a mother of 2 toddlers and their patience wears very thin. We went to Magic Kingdom last summer and really the lines weren't too bad. I'm terrified of the crowds when we go to MGM's Star Wars weekend. I'm hoping that they have a good system in place so that people can meet the characters and such, but I doubt it. Mainly because we waited an hour and a half for the kids to meet the winnie the pooh characters. I doubt that it will be any better for Darth Vadar.

Chiron said...

I attended an information session on Test Track hosted by then Epcot VP Linda Warren (now VP Marketing I might add). In the session, she discussed how it was known that the hourly capacity would be quite low for an E-ticket, that the ride would be *highly* susceptible to rain, and that part of the plan was to have four or five greeters outside managing the lines.

Chiron said...

I attended an information session on Test Track hosted by then Epcot VP Linda Warren (now VP Marketing I might add). In the session, she discussed how it was known that the hourly capacity would be quite low for an E-ticket, that the ride would be *highly* susceptible to rain, and that part of the plan was to have four or five greeters outside managing the lines.

As to the comment about more monorails and such at WDW...
Back before September 11th, there was a project underway looking at a new transportation master plan. Two of the driving issues behind the project was the number of busses on the roads and the labor required to run them. The project team was disbanded and sent back to their respective areas in the wake of 9/11 and the mad dash to cut expenses. It is my understanding that the plan would have used monorail hubs to reduce, but not eliminate, the busses.

pariartspaul said...

Hey Dan,
I think you've got a good suggestion there that DCA ought to be included in the Disneyland admission price. Who knows? They might sell twice as many tickets to Disneyland if people knew they'd be getting both parks for the price of one. And they'd have the extra capacity to handle it. All they'd need is some good stuff in DCA to draw people into it.

Imagineer-in-Waiting said...

Sorry to burst your million dollar/track mile bubble, but at $1M/mile, bring me monorails between Dulles airport and Washington DC today! Sorry, you're off by at least a factor of 10.
My best source is Kim Pedersen's weblog, monorails.org. Disney never released its actual figures for its original Florida system and the Epcot extension. Unfortunately, I can't find the source of the $68M/mile estimate. It is only an estimate.
Monorails.org has two similar projects. The original Las Vegas monorail using USED Disney Mark IV units from WDW ($25M/mile) and the recent extension using the first non-Disney Mark VI monorails ($88M/mile). 68 sure falls into that 25 - 88 range. Keep in mind right-of-way and utility relocation issues. Things have gotten very thickly settled.

Don't get me wrong. I always considered the monorail its own attraction, not just a transportation system. It's just a very expensive system that's a hard sell to management trying to please shareholders.

Anonymous said...

You know, I loved the concept of "The Rocket Rods." I know it was flawed because of the budget cuts of the previous regime. And it wasn't as fun as it looked.
But, if they did it right, there could be a cool attraction there.

Maybe they can add a small show building with some cool futuristic effects, and It would definitely need banked turns. Another possibility would be to rip out the current track and construct two seperate tracks to address the capicity problem it had.

You gotta admit, when it was working, it sure was cool to look at while walking through tomorrowland. Tomorrowland needs another "E" ticket family-thrill ride.

a@b said...

I'm not a big fan of standing in lines, especially long ones in theme parks that don't move.

However, if there's any place I'd stand in line, it would be Disneyland.

I think part of the appealing attraction for any attraction should be the line. You see and experience a lot going thru a line. And the longer you stand in one spot, the more you can appreciate the details. Indiana Jones Adventure, Star Tours, and Splash Mt., and A Bug's Life are a few rides where the experience begins at the start of the line.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree wholeheartedly with this post. The visual aspect of things that move is definitely much more interesting than static objects. And not only was Tomorrowland filled with transportation, Main Street had it's various antique vehicles, and Rivers of America was filled with all sorts of boats and canoes.

As for idea of moving people through attractions on ride systems, I had always thought that the ride-thru attraction was refined not only for capacity issues, but also because it presented an experience much superior to a theater show. In a theater, the best experience is only achieved for those in the optimal seats, in a ride-thru attraction, everyone gets to be put right in the center of the action.!!

-DL5263

JiminyCricketFan said...

I do think that allowing people to move through the park in a fun way is important. People just want a chance to sit down for a while. Why not make it fun?

Anonymous said...

I am posting this on the newest post since its at the top of the list. I love this site and have noticed that throughout the numerous thread there are cross messages. Most threads refer to comments / opionions that are inter related: theming, magic, vision . Posters are screaming for the Disney magic. It dosent matter if reconstrusting the weenie of the raised orbitors in Tommorrowland or the rebirth of the Tahitian Terrace or the usefulness of a closed plaza in the hub. It is apparent in they wish for once again tommorrowland to become the world on the move , and for the Golden Horseshoe to revert to its historic can can , slapstick value.Not a second park though its what guest wanted for so long they want it to be a meaningful unforgetable experience that only Disney can offer, not paramont, not universal and not Busch but signature Disney. Its so obvious that guest are looking for the Disney magic: not odv carts, and mdse sales opps, or for a simple C-D ticket attraction to promote the latest flick. Guest want substance something they will return to experience, something to tell their neighbors and friends , something on the cutting edge of technology , something to dream about, be in awe of and get the warm fuzzies over.

Anonymous said...

As for the previous comment about the $68 million/mile monorail price, I think the main cost is the right-of-way you mentioned. But if Disney already owns the property, the cost should be a bit less than that.

Granted, a million per mile seems too cheap, $68 mil/mile seems extravagent if there are limited or no right-of-way issues.
And given that, I'd like to see the monorail perform a nice loop all the way around DCA to show off that park to more guests. And yes, a station would be ideal.

Ted said...

I would never argue againist shorter lines, but in Disneyland's defensive, Disneyland can handle HUGE crowds and it not feel like there are HUGE crowds.

For example, I was at DL yesterday and the Timon parking lot was full, the parking garage was full (I parked in Minnie near the back), they had opened the overflow lot off of Disney Way AND there were cars all along the road from Timon to the parking garage.

However, INSIDE Disneyland, it didn't feel THAT crowded. I was with a 3 year old, so I stayed away from the BIG stuff like Space Mountain. But we never waited for more than 30 minutes for anything and we went on the Matterhorn (twice), Buzz Lightyear, Jungle Cruise, and Winnie the Pooh, among others.

Now with HALF that crowd Magic Mountain would have 1 hour+ lines on EVERYTHING!!

Anonymous said...

Monorails to DAK and Disney/MGM would help Disney and I'll tell you why. I know of three families off the top of my head, one of which is mine, that take their cars around for one reason: transportation to the other two parks SUCKS! It's horrible. And when a guest is in their car, a guest might leave property.
The busses are inefficient, cumbersome and none-to-fun. The monorail would keep more guests from turning on the ignition and risking the chance of spending their dollars away from the Flametree BBQ. The Monorail from Epcot to the Magic Kingdom is so much fun and so easy I do it gladly. If I could take it to the other two parks I guarantee Disney would have more of my money.

Which is ironic, since they pay me. . .

Epcot82 said...

The biggest irony to me has always been that Disney's Animal Kingdom uses "conservation" and love of the earth as two of its key themes ... but it's not connected by the pollution-free, efficient Monorail.

The conservation park is serviced instead by a massive asphalt parking lot filled with polluting, noisy, jam-causing cars.

Sadly amusing.

crystalcat67 said...

I agree with the irony about AK and transportation. However, I do not think the monorail is efficient, cost-effective, and pollution-free.

We DO need better transportation for all of the parks, and less pollution.

Last year at the 2005 World's Fair Expo in Japan, the theme of the show was minimal environmental impact. They had 22 million in attendance over 6 months. They used next-generation transportation - buses and rails with updated fuel options.

Disney could use these options, or design their own. The technology is out there.

My favorite is the Linimo - Japan's first Maglev train.

Read more about them at:
http://www.expo2005.or.jp/en/technology/index.html

Bob said...

mnmears,

A Peoplemover system from the main gate area to the Mickey and Friends parking structure was in the plans when WESTCOT was being envisioned. As was a long monorail system that would connect more hotels. When WESTCOT was canned in favor of DCA, all of this transportation was cut also. The result? Loud, smelly trams, or a sidewalk.

mnmears said...

What a shame that ALL the plans were thrown out when Westcot was deemed too expensive to build ... I still think it was shortsided to ditch the PeopleMover if it had been discussed or included in those plans.

Even if the initial investment had been higher ... I'm sure that bean counters would have seen the long-term savings in energy and personnel costs.

In addition -- and even more importantly -- it would have honored both Walt Disney and a system he helped devise or inspire for just the purpose he had initial envisioned.

Besides, I bet it would have scored well in guest surveys and let you know from the get-go that you were in a special, magical place.

A noisy, smelly polluting tram ride or a quiet, energy efficient glide to the park that might have helped sell the PeopleMover to airports, malls, cities? Hmmm?

Besides, I'm sure Disney could have found some governmental or environmental grant to help pay for the system had anyone spent some time working on the appropriate proposals.

I'm disappointed when the brain trust at Disney and Disney Imagineering can't see something so obvious to many guests or doesn't look at THE BIG PICTURE and give the world something a bit more environmentally friendly and unique. I know I can't be the only person who thought about a PeopleMover here.

crystalcat67 said...

At the last World's Fair Expo in Aichi, Japan, they had 22 million people attend in 6 months. They installed new buses and trains that were "more" energy efficient and moved masses through the Expo, and into/from the next major city.

I would call these the next generation Mono-rails and Buses. My favorite is Linimo, Japans first Maglev train.

http://www.expo2005.or.jp/en/technology/index.html

I'm sure transporting mobs of people is always a huge concern of Disney. And though we would like it to be a fun and scenic pleasure ride, they do have to think of all of the costs. Manpower, maintenance, installation, long-term 20+ years of usage, depreciation, etc.

These new trains and buses still might be too expensive for consideration. Cost Engineering is most likely the glass ceiling for all of these wonderful ideas. If it weren't, we would be flying from DL to DCA. Parkhopping from FLA to CA??

Nick Zegarac said...

The Disney theme park experience (both in Anaheim and Florida) has gradually being dumbed down for the consumer age over the course of the last 30 years. Instead of being assimilated into the experience (which was Disney's hope and dream) today's ticket holders are merely being placated with a variety of expendable diversions.

While I am not opposed to change, per say (and in keeping with Walt's edict that Disneyland will never be completed) it does seem as though most of the 'upgrades' or revisions to the original plans have been downgrades to that quaint and very tangible beauty for a simpler time that was the hallmark of all the attractions that Disney himself touched.

Even those that came later (after Walt) - as say - the Main Street Electrical Parade have gradually been replaced with attractions that share none of Disney's zeal for establishing an ulterior reality and cultural permanence. Instead, Disneyland is slowly becoming a theme park of disposability.

One vaguely recalls, for example Michael Jackson's Captain EO or Journey into Imagination with that loveable - yet largely forgettable purple dragon, Figment at EPCOT.

In Tomorrowland, the upgrades have been particularly obvious and damaging to the overall appeal of that themed land. The Tomorrow of Disney's era was on the go - a tangible symbol of progress and a culture swiftly on the march.

In contrast, today's Tomorrowland is more obviously a postmodern epitaph vaguely retitled "whatever happened to tomorrow?" The land and our culture are no longer on the move, but mired in a stagnation of creative thought while thumbing through the daydreams of yesteryear and looking upon them in quaint - perhaps bittersweet - reflection.

The loss of the traditional People Mover and attractions like the nuclear sub ride (or 20,000 Leagues at WDW) have stripped much of the timeless allure and magic from the Magic Kingdom. Such 'rides' were elevated from the moniker of 'mere attraction' into a sort of main event for the patron.

One, for example, continues today to look forward to a trip through the Pirates of the Carribean or It's a Small World. Yet, even such stoic main stays as the Matterhorn have been revamped - not as a means of improving upon an old idea, but rather removing all essence of its originality.

The net result is that Disneyland today and in totem has increasingly gathered the flavor of just another Knotsberry Farm or Six Flags - this one inhabited by a mouse.

Disney's California Adventure park is painfully close to that abysmal amusement enterprise that Disney himself deplored and sought to eradicate with his "some place where parents and children could have fun together."

Hence, what is being lost in this revising of Disneyland is not merely an allocation of space for another fantasy ride but a reallocation of that space to just another glorified and temporary side show that will never become the main event.

The Polsons said...

I never saw Disneyland with the sky buckets running, but after having been there a few times with a son whose two favorite attractions are on opposite ends of the park, I say BRING BACK THE SKY BUCKETS!! They have them at the Santa Cruz Boardwalk and man are they great for getting across the park when your feet are dead tired. I look whistfully up at the now overgrown station near Pinocchio's restaurant and my feet silently scream to me "WHYYYY!!!"

Frankenseuss said...

I don't think anyone else has mentioned it, so I just wanted to comment that the Buzz Lightyear Astro-Blasters loads ridiculously fast. The cars are constantly loading. I was amazed how quickly they could burn through a line. That was great.

But I'd also like to agree with the poster above who mentioned the experience of the lines being important. I remember as kid, when Star Tours was the newest ride, my siblings and I ran straight there when the park opened and were able to go straight in. We loved it, but were far more impressed when we went back and had to wait in the line first. (I sure miss the intergalactic travel posters that are now replaced by the gawd awful Energizer advertisements.)

Indiana Jones has an even better queue.

And back to Buzz Lightyear - I like how the line is crucial to the plot (with Buzz briefing you and telling you to rendezvous with him later, referring to the climax of the ride).

Ghostbuster626 said...

Well Disneyland is getting new Monorails, the return of the submarine Voyage (but as a nemo tie-in UGH!) and hopefully WDI will create a new form of Peoplemover. So I hope Disney realizes the problem.